Hockey Canada has confronted important opposition to an investigation into allegations of sexual abuse

Hockey Canada’s latest investigation has left some shaking their heads because it raises obscure questions on how the group handles sexual assault circumstances.

The survey, seen by CBC Information, was distributed to oldsters, volunteers and coaches and sought to gauge opinions concerning the nationwide sports activities group.

The 2018 gala in London has come underneath intense scrutiny since information of sexual assault involving eight unidentified gamers, together with members of that 12 months’s world junior staff, emerged this spring.

The 2003 world junior staff was sexually assaulted in July. Nothing that has not been confirmed in court docket.

Individuals have been requested to fee their degree of settlement with a number of statements, together with:

  • “The extent of media criticism of hockey in Canada is just too excessive.”
  • “It is going to most likely by no means occur once more.”
  • “The crime is about just a few hockey gamers and doesn’t signify the hockey tradition of this nation.”

They have been additionally requested to contemplate how necessary hockey is to Canada, which is working “to handle points with the hockey system” and to “cease the usage of membership charges to cowl uninsured sexual assault claims.”

Hockey Canada advised a parliamentary committee that almost all of its funds got here from the Nationwide Capital Fund, which is outlined by minor hockey league registration charges, sparking a public outcry.

The group mentioned in July it might not use the fund to settle such claims.

“How can they be so clueless?”

Lisa Wallace is an Ottawa sports activities author who covers all ranges of hockey from minor hockey to the NHL and has a 15-year-old son who performs AAA hockey.

“I used to be conducting a survey [and] I used to be actually shaking my head studying a few of these questions as a result of I used to be like, “How are they so clueless?” I assumed,” he mentioned.

Whether or not it is the Canadian hockey staff or the market analysis agency Forsta conducting the survey, Wallace mentioned the folks behind the query do not appear to grasp how the group is feeling proper now.

The query of media protection additionally left a nasty style.

“I used to be identical to, ‘Actually? Are you anxious about that? It is like persons are anxious that they have been handled unfairly?”

When requested concerning the examine Wednesday, Sports activities Minister Pascale Saint-Onge advised reporters in French that Hockey Canada desires concrete adjustments, not a public relations train.

Individuals have been requested to offer their views on whether or not sports activities organizations ought to introduce improved character checks for all high-performance gamers, a complete system to trace and report all abuse complaints, and an apology.

In addition they requested whether or not sports activities organizations wanted to have “related and various management”, “clarify what occurred” and “introduce new management”.

In July, Hockey Canada apologized and introduced it might reopen a third-party investigation into the 2018 sexual assault allegations.

And amid rising public stress for a serious change in administration, legal professional Andrea Skinner has been appointed as interim board chair.

Vary of questions

Circulating screenshots of survey questions on social media. “These ballot questions present precisely the place their heads are,” one tweet learn. “So @HockeyCanada ….is the media exaggerating all of this? Get on the mic and say so,” mentioned one other.

The assertion mentioned the group was not attempting to downplay the challenges it confronted or “horrific allegations of sexual abuse in opposition to former members of the nationwide staff”.

“Particular survey questions have been developed to gauge the perceptions and sentiments of members of the hockey group concerning the points going through Hockey Canada,” the assertion mentioned.

“On quite a few questions not too long ago shared on social media, contributors got numerous statements to reply whether or not they agreed or disagreed.”

Hockey Canada mentioned the statements included the phrases, “We’re reconsidering my kid’s participation in hockey,” and that “Hockey Canada can do nothing to revive my confidence.”

Wallace does not know why a sports activities group would want to conduct analysis. That cash may have been used for higher packages, corresponding to consciousness of the significance of consent, he mentioned.

“I ponder if their management does not perceive the heart beat of Canadian mother and father? [To the degree] Do you suppose you must spend more cash to conduct this examine?”

About the author


Leave a Comment